“Features of Seller Financing” - Priscilla
As an alternative to or in addition to a bank or other lending institution, seller financing involves the buyer taking out a loan from the seller to pay for the purchase of a home. In other words, this is a system where the seller pays for his own property to be purchased. Although it is less prevalent these days, many buyers and sellers are still seeing it as a realistic choice. If handled methodically and professionally, this is a fantastic alternative because it results in a win-win scenario for both the buyer and the seller.
The majority of buyers consider banks or lending organizations as their first choice for a mortgage. They frequently look outside for other choices if they are denied eligibility at these places. Seller financing is useful in this situation. For those with insufficient credit to qualify for a loan, seller financing can be a very helpful tool.
This financing option has benefits and drawbacks just like any other. The flexibility this sort of financing gives in terms of interest rates and tenure is one of its main benefits. The buyer and seller can agree on a favorable rate for a longer term or a higher rate for a shorter term. Depending on the convenience of the seller and the buyer, this can be arranged. Furthermore, since bank fees are not necessary, the buyer can save pre-mortgage insurance fees and potentially significantly lower closing costs. The terms of the sale are negotiable between the buyer and the seller. He can try to secure financing for all of his alternatives by including equipment or vehicles in the transaction. These are the benefits for the buyer, however using this kind of financing also benefits the seller in several ways. He receives a higher return on his equity in the form of an interest rate, which can be translated into the ability to cover his responsibilities with this amount.
Additionally, there are a few drawbacks to this technique. The seller must exercise extra caution when providing finance for the acquisition because the buyer can start to default. This increases the seller's burden by requiring financial status verification of the buyer. Additionally, the buyer might have kept important information from the seller, which would have had negative financial ramifications for him. These may even result in short sales or foreclosures. On the other hand, even if the buyer had been paying the seller on schedule, the seller would still have fallen behind on the mortgage on the same home. This may also result in foreclosure or a situation similar to this, without the buyer's fault.
However, there’s a way to avoid all this by having a clause saying that the house will be deeded back to the original owner if the buyer defaults. This saves an extreme amount of time and headaches. The only down fall is that you will be the owner of the house again, but all the hard work and money they put in will go back to you and that is not a bad thing.
Therefore, it can be stated that this method is a valid option to consider, given both the seller and the buyer have confidence in one another and both of them keep their end of the bargain.